The 4 Waves Of Freedom Of Speech

The 4 Waves Of Freedom Of Speech

1st wave (nonexistent)

People are ‘entitled to freedom of speech’ so long as it doesn’t break the peace, encourages other people to commit crimes, defames etc.

People: Lee hsien loong, Singapore government, most singaporeans, communists, fascists

2nd wave (seditious)

It’s alright to offend (politicians, celebrities etc.) unless it concerns race or religion

People: Most people in Europe, most pro-opposition supporters in Singapore. Most ex ‘supporters’ of Amos Yee

3rd wave (the 1st amendment)

It’s alright to say anything as long as it doesn’t incite violence

People: Most people from the West. Most people who are sane. Most supporters of Amos Yee.

4th wave(absolutist)

You should be able to say whatever you want, even if it incites violence, and not be punished by law. Therefore if Hitler existed today, he should not be sentenced.

People: Amos Yee

Which wave of freedom of speech are you? :S

The 4 Waves Of Freedom Of Speech

Muslim defends Quran

Let’s debunk them all: 1. Quran[2:191-193]….. Basically the site claims that it’s urging THEM(Yes the verses talks about a specific time in the PAST and the website admits it) for “offensive warfare”. That’s totally bullshit. If those retards followed the full context, they’d know what’s going on EXACTLY. Quran[2:190]:”Fight in the way of Allah those who fight you but do not *transgress* . Indeed. Allah does not like *transgressors* .” *Sahih International Approved* So, Allah didn’t urge Muhammad[PBUH] for “Offensive warfare” and it was also for self defense. Not only this but also if you go to Quran[2:193]:”Fight them until there is no [more] fitnah and [until] worship is [acknowledged to be] for Allah . But if they cease, then there is to be no aggression except against the oppressors.” The word “Fitna” means corruption NOT disbelief. It can mean disbelief but won’t apply nor make any sense in this verse. Anyway, these people were a source of corruption. So Muhammad[PBUH] and his army were ordered NOT to transgress, and were ordered to fight them if they fight you (Self defense as the website stupidly denies) and also these people were a source of corruption. Talk about warfare?! I’ll tell you this is the most merciful tactic of all time. 2. Quran[2:244]:”And fight in the cause of Allah and know that Allah is Hearing and Knowing.” Now, whom should we fight?! Is it stated?! It’s only stated to do so generally. Yes, whenever we fight something we do it in the cause of Allah. It can be positive and it can be negative. So therefore it’s neutral! But since the negative is not allowed for us, it’s positive. Yes, we aren’t allowed to fight in a negative way. 3. Quran[2:216]: “Fighting has been enjoined upon you while it is hateful to you. But perhaps you hate a thing and it is good for you; and perhaps you love a thing and it is bad for you. And Allah Knows, while you know not.” Again, it’s not stated whom should we fight specifically, and it states that from a general point of view. Meaning it’s neither fighting positively(Against something bad) nor fighting negatively(Against something good). And again; since we’re not allowed except to fight the bad, then it’s not a negative fight. And also the site claims that this is according to the context, while it’s actually not. The context literally ends before the verse. And even though, the second verse’s words were obviously towards us, Muslims. So as a result, following hadiths would be so irrelevant. Especially that they don’t cit the hadith nor the numbers of Hadiths. And still they’re not done, they’d have to make sure if the Hadith is Sahih, or Da’if, which identify the authenticity of the Hadith itself. 4. Quran[3:56]: “And as for those who disbelieved, I will punish them with a severe punishment in this world and the Hereafter, and they will have no helpers.”” Allah HAS a right to say that.. The truth is in front of them, yet they disbelieve… So they deserve punishment FROM ALLAH ONLY, NOT US, MUSLIMS. 5.Quran[3:151]: “We will cast terror into the hearts of those who disbelieve for what they have associated with Allah of which He had not sent down [any] authority. And their refuge will be the Fire, and wretched is the residence of the wrongdoers.” Yes, these are Allah’s words, and that’s what he’s going to do with them for stupidly thinking that god is three or whatever it is. There’s no god but Alalh. Very clear, and very logical. Furthermore, it’s Allah’s job not ours. 6. Quran[4:74]: “So let those fight in the cause of Allah who sell the life of this world for the Hereafter. And he who fights in the cause of Allah and is killed or achieves victory – We will bestow upon him a great reward.” The website stupidly claims that this verse allows suicide bombing. That’s basically false. These suicide bombers we see in the news today kill INNOCENTS. And we’re not allowed to kill innocents NO MATTER what. Even though, this verse is obviously talking about a war. 7. Quran[4:76]: “Those who believe fight in the cause of Allah , and those who disbelieve fight in the cause of Taghut. So fight against the allies of Satan. Indeed, the plot of Satan has ever been weak.” Allah is basically stating a fact. A true believer would fight in the cause of Allah, while a true disbeliever would fight in the cause of Taghut(Satan). 8. Quran[4:89]:”They wish you would disbelieve as they disbelieved so you would be alike. So do not take from among them allies until they emigrate for the cause of Allah . But if they turn away, then seize them and kill them wherever you find them and take not from among them any ally or helper. ” Does your site follow the full context?! No?! Quran[4:90]: “Except for those who take refuge with a people between yourselves and whom is a *treaty* or those who come to you, their hearts strained at [the prospect of] fighting you or fighting their own people. And if Allah had willed, He could have given them power over you, and they would have fought you. So if they remove themselves from you and do not fight you and offer you peace, then Allah has not made for you a cause [for fighting] against them.” Allah is so merciful! 🙂 9. Quran[4:95]: “Not equal are those believers remaining [at home] – other than the disabled – and the mujahideen, [who strive and fight] in the cause of Allah with their wealth and their lives. Allah has preferred the mujahideen through their wealth and their lives over those who remain [behind], by degrees. And to both Allah has promised the best [reward]. But Allah has preferred the mujahideen over those who remain [behind] with a great reward -” “This passage criticizes “peaceful” Muslims who do not join in the violence, letting them know that they are less worthy in Allah’s eyes. It also demolishes the modern myth that “Jihad” doesn’t mean holy war in the Quran, but rather a spiritual struggle. Not only is this Arabic word (mujahiduna) used in this passage, but it is clearly not referring to anything spiritual, since the physically disabled are given exemption. (The Hadith reveals the context of the passage to be in response to a blind man’s protest that he is unable to engage in Jihad, which would not make sense if it meant an internal struggle).” Oh wow! I think I got brain cancer once I read this. This is litterally one of the stupidest thing I’ve eer read since ages. No offense, but this is the truth. First of all, Allah wasn’t telling us to kill all non-Muslims, there was a humane exception in the full context of the previous verse, which they probably intentionally missed. But that’s okay. Anyway this verse is also in the same context of the previous one. The stupid thing here is that they misinterpret the meaning of “Jihad”. First, Jihad when translated to Arabic it means “Struggle”. This struggle is meant to be against corruption, injustice, proverty, or anything inhumane. None of that “Holy war” bullcrap that the media(which is in fact, controlled by anti-Islam zionists) tells you. So as a result, they misinterpret the meaning of Jihad. 10. Quran[4:104]: “”And be not weak hearted in pursuit of the enemy; if you suffer pain, then surely they (too) suffer pain as you suffer pain…” ” Is pursuing an injured and retreating enemy really an act of self-defense?”” And do you know what “Enemy” Allah is talking about?! This is still in the same context of the two previous verses. And the enemy is the disbelievers exculding the ones with a truce between us and them. 11. Quran (5:33) – “The punishment of those who wage war against Allah and His messenger and strive to make mischief in the land is only this, that they should be murdered or crucified or their hands and their feet should be cut off on opposite sides or they should be imprisoned; this shall be as a disgrace for them in this world, and in the hereafter they shall have a grievous chastisement”” Sorry, does the site intend to add more space in it’s website?! Or didn’t they read that sentence: “and strive to make *mischief* in the land is only this” 12. Quran (8:12) – “I will cast terror into the hearts of those who disbelieve. Therefore strike off their heads and strike off every fingertip of them” No reasonable person would interpret this to mean a spiritual struggle.” No way! Your website is EXPOSED. Did you know how?! THESE websites are CONSPIRING ISLAM. Therefore they’re Zioinist. The same verse, stated in the SAME way I found it in SAQ website. But do you know what’s wrong with the verse?! THE VERSE IS INCOMPLETE. THE ASSHOLES MISSED THE FIRST PART. THEY INTENDED TO DO SO. Quran[8:12]: “[Remember] when your Lord inspired to the *angels* , “I am with you, so strengthen those who have believed. I will cast terror into the hearts of those who disbelieved, so strike [them] upon the necks and strike from them every fingertip.” TO THE ANGELS, NOT TO US…. OMG… 13. Quran (8:15) – “O ye who believe! When ye meet those who disbelieve in battle, turn not your backs to them. (16)Whoso on that day turneth his back to them, unless maneuvering for battle or intent to join a company, he truly hath incurred wrath from Allah, and his habitation will be hell, a hapless journey’s end.” “In battle” Not “In killing innocents” or “In suicide bombing them” Since when this is supposed to be inhumane?! And also, turning your back to the enemy means that you’re betraying your army.

14. Quran (8:39) – “And fight with them until there is no more fitna (disorder, unbelief) and religion is all for Allah” Some translations interpret “fitna” as “persecution”, but the traditional understanding of this word is not supported by the historical context (See notes for 2:193). The Meccans were simply refusing Muhammad access to their city during Haj. Other Muslims were allowed to travel there – just not as an armed group, since Muhammad had declared war on Mecca prior to his eviction. The Meccans were also acting in defense of their religion, since it was Muhammad’s intention to destroy their idols and establish Islam by force (which he later did). Hence the critical part of this verse is to fight until “religion is only for Allah”, meaning that the true justification of violence was the unbelief of the opposition. According to the Sira (Ibn Ishaq/Hisham 324) Muhammad further explains that “Allah must have no rivals.”” Fitna means Corruption not unbelief. It can mean unbelief, because corruption causes unbelief. And Islam was never established by force. Muhammad[PBUH] was trying to let them understand Islam, and that it’s more logical than worshipping idols. But people arrogantly refused and PERSECUTED and PUNISHED those who convert to Islam since Islam was about to take over the population of Mecca. But then of course, Muhammad[PBUH] escaped to Medina, where people there were friendly and weren’t under pagan rule. So they all converrted to Islam despite the population being small. Then attacked Mecca and won despite their small size(Angels were sent down by Allah to help the Muslims in Battle of Badr). 15.Quran (8:57) – “If thou comest on them in the war, deal with them so as to strike fear in those who are behind them, that haply they may remember.” More clear translation(Sahih International): “So if you, [O Muhammad], gain dominance over them in war, disperse by [means of] them those behind them that perhaps they will be reminded.” Allah is talking to Muhammad[PBUH]. 🙂 16.Quran (8:67) – “It is not for a Prophet that he should have prisoners of war until he had made a great slaughter in the land…” (Sahih international) : It is not for a prophet to have captives [of war] until he inflicts a massacre *[upon Allah ‘s enemies]* in the land. Some Muslims desire the commodities of this world, but Allah desires [for you] the Hereafter. And Allah is Exalted in Might and Wise. And Allah’s enemy are those with the source of fitna. 17. Quran (8:59-60) – “And let not those who disbelieve suppose that they can outstrip (Allah’s Purpose). Lo! they cannot escape. Make ready for them all thou canst of (armed) force and of horses tethered, that thereby ye may dismay the enemy of Allah and your enemy.” Read Quran[8:60]: “And prepare against them whatever you are able of power and of steeds of war by which you may *terrify* the enemy of Allah and your enemy and others besides them whom you do not know [but] whom Allah knows. And whatever you spend in the cause of Allah will be fully repaid to you, and you will not be wronged.” Terrifying is not violence.. 18.Quran (8:65) – “O Prophet, exhort the believers to fight…” No No No, complete the verse……. Quran[8:65]: “O Prophet, urge the believers to battle. If there are among you twenty [who are] steadfast, they will overcome two hundred. And if there are among you one hundred [who are] steadfast, they will overcome a thousand of those who have disbelieved because they are a people who do not understand.” Battle of Uhud describes all of this. The reason why twenty would overcome two hundred of the enemy is that the angels will be sent down to fight with the disbelievers. 19. Quran (9:5) – “So when the sacred months have passed away, then slay the idolaters wherever you find them, and take them captive and besiege them and lie in wait for them in every ambush, then if they repent and keep up prayer and pay the poor-rate, leave their way free to them.” According to this verse, the best way of staying safe from Muslim violence at the time of Muhammad was to convert to Islam: prayer (salat) and the poor tax (zakat) are among the religion’s Five Pillars. The popular claim that the Quran only inspires violence within the context of self-defense is seriously challenged by this passage as well, since the Muslims to whom it was written were obviously not under attack. Had they been, then there would have been no waiting period (earlier verses make it a duty for Muslims to fight in self-defense, even during the sacred months). The historical context is Mecca after the idolaters were subjugated by Muhammad and posed no threat. Once the Muslims had power, they violently evicted those unbelievers who would not convert.” LOOOOOOOL! This is LEGIT brain cancer. Listen retards, did you follow the full context?! Read Quran[9:1]: [This is a declaration of] *disassociation* , from Allah and His Messenger, to those with whom you had made a *treaty* among the polytheists. Read Quran[9:2]: So travel freely, [O disbelievers], throughout the land [during] four months but know that you cannot cause failure to Allah and that Allah will disgrace the disbelievers. Read Quran[9:3]:And [it is] an announcement from Allah and His Messenger to the people on the day of the greater pilgrimage that Allah is disassociated from the disbelievers, and [so is] His Messenger. So if you repent, that is best for you; but if you turn away – then know that you will not cause failure to Allah . And give tidings to those who disbelieve of a painful punishment. Read Quran[9:4]:Excepted are those with whom you made a *treaty* among the polytheists and then they have not been *deficient toward you in anything or supported anyone against you*; so complete for them their treaty until their term [has ended]. Indeed, Allah loves the righteous [who fear Him]. Now, Read Quran[9:5] 🙂 LOL 20. Quran (9:14) – “Fight against them so that Allah will punish them by your hands and disgrace them and give you victory over them and heal the breasts of a believing people.” Humiliating and hurting non-believers not only has the blessing of Allah, but it is ordered as a means of carrying out his punishment and even “healing” the hearts of Muslims.” CONTEXT PLEASE: Quran[9:13]: “Would you not fight a people who *broke* their *oaths* and determined to expel the Messenger, and they had begun [the attack upon] you the first time? Do you fear them? But Allah has more right that you should fear Him, if you are [truly] believers.” :))

21. Quran (9:20) – “Those who believe, and have left their homes and striven with their wealth and their lives in Allah’s way are of much greater worth in Allah’s sight. These are they who are triumphant.” The Arabic word interpreted as “striving” in this verse is the same root as “Jihad”. The context is obviously holy war. No, it’s OBVIOUSLY not “Holy war”. The word Jihad itself means Struggle against something inhumane. Its root is “Juhd” which means effort or struggle(One actually leads to the other). Anyway, “strive” is not “Holy war” and you don’t be a genuis to figure taht out, and if you’d do the opposite and think that it’s not then sorry this website has something wrong regarding its authors who seem brainless. 22. Quran (9:29) – “Fight those who believe not in Allah nor the Last Day, nor hold that forbidden which hath been forbidden by Allah and His Messenger, nor acknowledge the religion of Truth, (even if they are) of the People of the Book, until they pay the Jizya with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued.” “People of the Book” refers to Christians and Jews. According to this verse, they are to be violently subjugated, with the sole justification being their religious status. Verse 9:33 tells Muslims that Allah has charted them to make Islam “superior over all religions.” This chapter was one of the final “revelations” from Allah and it set in motion the tenacious military expansion, in which Muhammad’s companions managed to conquer two-thirds of the Christian world in the next 100 years. Islam is intended to dominate all other people and faiths. No, people back then didn’t have the choice of either converting to Islam or Paying the Jizyah. The root meaning of the word “Jizya” means compensation. It’s the tax that non-Muslims pay in order to provide for themselves protection, despite being the minority, and freedom for them and the others to practice their religion by building religous buildings and temples in the land that was supposedly Muslim. It’s okay for females, children, monks, hermits, and slaves not to pay it according to Abu Hanifa[RA]. Now, if you follow the full context you’d know that Allah is talking about the time of Muhammad[PBUH]. Quran[9:28]:”O you who have believed, indeed the polytheists are unclean, so let them not approach al-Masjid al-Haram after this, their *[final] year* . And if you fear privation, Allah will enrich you from His bounty if He wills. Indeed, Allah is Knowing and Wise.” 23. Quran (9:30) – “And the Jews say: Ezra is the son of Allah; and the Christians say: The Messiah is the son of Allah; these are the words of their mouths; they imitate the saying of those who disbelieved before; may Allah destroy them; how they are turned away!” Allah is simply saying a fact, what’s wrong with that?! Oh I get it.. Perhaps the authors lack a brain. 24. Quran (9:38-39) – “O ye who believe! what is the matter with you, that, when ye are asked to go forth in the cause of Allah, ye cling heavily to the earth? Do ye prefer the life of this world to the Hereafter? But little is the comfort of this life, as compared with the Hereafter. Unless ye go forth, He will punish you with a grievous penalty, and put others in your place.” This is a warning to those who refuse to fight, that they will be punished with Hell. Refuse to “fight” what?! The answer: corruption, poverty, injustice, or anything inhumane, basically Jihad, or we can say the word that you guys failed to know its real meaning. That’s fine for someone who’d lack a brain. No offense intended. 25. Quran (9:41) – “Go forth, light-armed and heavy-armed, and strive with your wealth and your lives in the way of Allah! That is best for you if ye but knew.” See also the verse that follows (9:42) – “If there had been immediate gain (in sight), and the journey easy, they would (all) without doubt have followed thee, but the distance was long, (and weighed) on them” This contradicts the myth that Muslims are to fight only in self-defense, since the wording implies that battle will be waged a long distance from home (in another country and on Christian soil, in this case, according to the historians). Since you this website misinterprets “Jihad” then most of these claims they have made would debunk themselves. Muslims do fight, ONLY in the form of Jihad (which is a struggle against corruption, poverty, inhustice, or anything inhumane). Allah basically in this verse tells us that the hypocrites would continue and fight with the Muslim IF the distance of the “waged war” is close. This waged war can be anywhere! In christian soil, jewish soil, etc. As long as the war has been waged, which would never happen except if a treaty have been broken(According to Quran and Muhammad[PBUH]’s sira), or except if they have transgressed.

26. Quran (9:73) – “O Prophet! strive hard against the unbelievers and the hypocrites and be unyielding to them; and their abode is hell, and evil is the destination.” Dehumanizing those who reject Islam, by reminding Muslims that unbelievers are merely firewood for Hell, makes it easier to justify slaughter. It also explains why today’s devout Muslims have little regard for those outside the faith. Quran[9:73](Sahih International): “O Prophet, fight against the disbelievers and the hypocrites and be harsh upon them. And their refuge is Hell, and wretched is the destination.” No one is basically dehumanized. That’s riddiculously stupid. It is refferring to the disbelievers in the days of Muhammad[PBUH]. That’s first of all. Second of all, the word fight in this verse is translated in the original Arabic translation as “Jahed” which is the verb form and past tense of the word “Jihad”. Therefore, he’d be struggling against something inhumane. It’ll be better if we add context: Quran[9:74]: “They swear by Allah that they did not say [anything against the Prophet] while they had said the word of disbelief and disbelieved after their [pretense of] Islam and planned that which they were not to attain. And they were not resentful except [for the fact] that Allah and His Messenger had enriched them of His bounty. So if they repent, it is better for them; but if they turn away, Allah will punish them with a painful punishment in this world and the Hereafter. And there will not be for them on earth any protector or helper.” Quran[9:75]: “And among them are those who made a covenant with Allah , [saying], “If He should give us from His bounty, we will surely spend in charity, and we will surely be among the righteous.”” 27. Quran (9:88) – “But the Messenger, and those who believe with him, strive and fight with their wealth and their persons: for them are (all) good things: and it is they who will prosper.” I don’t see any urging for the current Muslims(Us) to fight and kill innocents(Like what the terrorists do) in this verse. In fact, I see stated facts by Allah about Muhammad[PBUH] and the believers IN the PAST. And where they basically sacrificed themselves to fight against corruption, injustice, poverty, or anything inhumane. 28. Quran (9:111) – “Allah hath purchased of the believers their persons and their goods; for theirs (in return) is the garden (of Paradise): they fight in His cause, and slay and are slain: a promise binding on Him in truth, through the Law, the Gospel, and the Quran: and who is more faithful to his covenant than Allah? then rejoice in the bargain which ye have concluded: that is the achievement supreme.” How does the Quran define a true believer? Quran[9:111]: “Indeed, Allah has purchased from the believers their lives and their properties [in exchange] for that they will have Paradise. They fight in the cause of Allah , *so they kill and are killed* . [It is] a true promise [binding] upon Him in the Torah and the Gospel and the Qur’an. And who is truer to his covenant than Allah ? So rejoice in your transaction which you have contracted. And it is that which is the great attainment.” Allah is simply talking about those believers in wars. How?! Because when Allah says that he purchases their lives and properties that means that these believers ARE in war and ARE fighting! Because they either lose their properties or their lives. So basically they’d kill or be killed. So therefore, Allah is talking about those disbelievers fighting in a war. 29. Quran (9:123) – “O you who believe! fight those of the unbelievers who are near to you and let them find in you hardness.” Context please.. 🙂 According to the context, we get to know that this order is given to the Muslims in a specific period of time in the PAST. Not the present. Quran[9:120]: “It *was* not [proper] for the people of Madinah and those surrounding them of the bedouins that they remain behind after [the departure of] the Messenger of Allah or that they prefer themselves over his self. That is because they are not afflicted by thirst or fatigue or hunger in the cause of Allah , nor do they tread on any ground that enrages the disbelievers, nor do they inflict upon an enemy any infliction but that is registered for them as a righteous deed. Indeed, Allah does not allow to be lost the reward of the doers of good.” Quran[9:121]: “Nor do they spend an expenditure, small or large, or cross a valley but that it is registered for them that Allah may reward them for the best of what they were doing.” Quran[9:122]: “And it is not for the believers to go forth [to battle] all at once. For there should separate from every division of them a group [remaining] to obtain understanding in the religion and warn their people when they return to them that they might be cautious.” 30. Quran (17:16) – “And when We wish to destroy a town, We send Our commandment to the people of it who lead easy lives, but they transgress therein; thus the word proves true against it, so We destroy it with utter destruction.” Note that the crime is moral transgression, and the punishment is “utter destruction.” (Before ordering the 9/11 attacks, Osama bin Laden first issued Americans an invitation to Islam). Do you know who is to destroy a town?! Allah. Not us, muslims. Allah is using “we” because it’s a way of promoting and showing highness to yourself in Arabic language. And even though, 9/11 was an attack. This attack didn’t destroy a single city in America. And when did Osama bin laden invite Americans to Islam?! Also, we all know that 9/11 was done by Zionists not Muslims.

31. Quran (18:65-81) – This parable lays the theological groundwork for honor killings, in which a family member is murdered because they brought shame to the family, either through apostasy or perceived moral indiscretion. The story (which is not found in any Jewish or Christian source) tells of Moses encountering a man with “special knowledge” who does things which don’t seem to make sense on the surface, but are then justified according to later explanation. One such action is to murder a youth for no apparent reason (74). However, the wise man later explains that it was feared that the boy would “grieve” his parents by “disobedience and ingratitude.” He was killed so that Allah could provide them a ‘better’ son. [Note: This parable along with verse 58:22 is a major reason that honor killing is sanctioned by Sharia. Reliance of the Traveler (Umdat al-Saliq) says that punishment for murder is not applicable when a parent or grandparent kills their offspring (o.1.12).] This is RIDDICOLUS! There is NO order of killing or violence from Allah to us in these verse against non-Muslims! Don’t try and match stories and irrelvant stuff with what the terrorits who aren’t even Muslims do. 32. Quran (21:44) – “We gave the good things of this life to these men and their fathers until the period grew long for them; See they not that We gradually reduce the land (in their control) from its outlying borders? Is it then they who will win?” I still can’t see the orders from Allah to us, Muslims where we do like ISIS and these terrorist groups. This verse just normally states that Muhammad[PBUH] have defeated and therefore opened the land of the Pagans(who tortured and killed anyone who converts to Islam) for the muslims. 33. Quran (25:52) – “Therefore listen not to the Unbelievers, but strive against them with the utmost strenuousness…” “Strive against” is Jihad – obviously not in the personal context. It’s also significant to point out that this is a Meccan verse. And Jihad is a struggle against corruption, injustice, poverty, or anything inhumane. So therefore these unbelievers were a source of all of these bad things. 34. Quran (33:60-62) – “If the hypocrites, and those in whose hearts is a disease, and the alarmists in the city do not cease, We verily shall urge thee on against them, then they will be your neighbors in it but a little while. Accursed, they will be seized wherever found and slain with a (fierce) slaughter.” This passage sanctions the slaughter (rendered “merciless” and “horrible murder” in other translations) against three groups: Hypocrites (Muslims who refuse to “fight in the way of Allah” (3:167) and hence don’t act as Muslims should), those with “diseased hearts” (which include Jews and Christians 5:51-52), and “alarmists” or “agitators who include those who merely speak out against Islam, according to Muhammad’s biographers. It is worth noting that the victims are to be sought out by Muslims, which is what today’s terrorists do. If this passage is meant merely to apply to the city of Medina, then it is unclear why it is included in Allah’s eternal word to Muslim generations. Some very CURCIAL set of errors have been detected. 1.. The hypocrites are those who claim they have accpeted Islam, while they actually secretly didn’t . They are traitors to Islam and the Muslims and want them to die. 2.. Those with “diseased hearts DOES not include Jews and Christians. Let’s check the verses out: Quran[5:51]: “O you who have believed, do not take the Jews and the Christians as allies. They are [in fact] allies of one another. And whoever is an ally to them among you – then indeed, he is [one] of them. Indeed, Allah guides not the wrongdoing people.” Quran[5:52]: “So you see those in whose hearts is disease *hastening into [association with] them*, saying, “We are afraid a misfortune may strike us.” But perhaps Allah will bring conquest or a decision from Him, and they will become, over what they have been concealing within themselves, regretful.” Now where in these two verses does Allah describe the Jews and Christians to have diseased hearts?! Having diseased hearts point two kinds of evil: (1) That a person should be an ill-wisher of Islam and the Muslims although he gets himself counted among the Muslims; and (2) That he should be cherishing evil intentions and having criminal mentality and his evil tendencies be manifesting themselves in everything he thinks and does. Source: 3.. “Alarmists”, “Agitators”, are those who spread rumors. NOT who talk ill about Islam. It’s also translate as “Those who spread rumors” in Sahih International translation: “If the hypocrites and those in whose hearts is disease and *those who spread rumors* in al-Madinah do not cease, We will surely incite you against them; then they will not remain your neighbors therein except for a little.” 35. Quran (47:3-4) – “Those who disbelieve follow falsehood, while those who believe follow the truth from their Lord… So, when you meet (in fight Jihad in Allah’s Cause), those who disbelieve smite at their necks till when you have killed and wounded many of them, then bind a bond firmly (on them, i.e. take them as captives)… If it had been Allah’s Will, He Himself could certainly have punished them (without you). But (He lets you fight), in order to test you, some with others. But those who are killed in the Way of Allah, He will never let their deeds be lost.” Those who reject Allah are to be killed in Jihad. The wounded are to be held captive for ransom. The only reason Allah doesn’t do the dirty work himself is to to test the faithfulness of Muslims. Those who kill pass the test. Let’s see Sahih International Quran[47:3]: “That is because those who disbelieve follow falsehood, and those who believe follow the truth from their Lord. Thus does Allah present to the people their comparisons.” Quran[47:4]: “So when you meet those who disbelieve *[in battle]* , strike [their] necks until, when you have inflicted slaughter upon them, then secure their bonds, and either [confer] favor afterwards or ransom [them] until the *war* lays down its burdens. That [is the command]. And if Allah had willed, He could have taken vengeance upon them [Himself], but [He ordered armed struggle] to test some of you by means of others. And those who are killed in the cause of Allah – never will He waste their deeds.” “In BATTLE”… “Until the war lays down its burdens” Did you read that?! Good. Because when it’s a war, you can do these things. 36. Quran (47:35) – “Be not weary and faint-hearted, crying for peace, when ye should be uppermost (Shakir: “have the upper hand”) for Allah is with you,” This translation is so false. Sahih international arabic precise translation: “So do not *weaken* and *call* for peace while you are *superior*; and Allah is with you and will never deprive you of [the reward of] your deeds.” This translation applies the MOST with the original unchanged Arabic translation. And litterally, calling for peace would most likely mean surrendering but in a draw. That’s stupid because you’d be superior in the case Allah’s talking about. So why would you surrender, where you already won?! 37. Quran (48:17) – “There is no blame for the blind, nor is there blame for the lame, nor is there blame for the sick (that they go not forth to war). And whoso obeyeth Allah and His messenger, He will make him enter Gardens underneath which rivers flow; and whoso turneth back, him will He punish with a painful doom.” Contemporary apologists sometimes claim that Jihad means ‘spiritual struggle.’ Is so, then why are the blind, lame and sick exempted? This verse also says that those who do not fight will suffer torment in hell. Jihad is a stuggle against corruption, injustice, poverty, or anything inhumane. It can be in the form of war. So yeah.

38. Quran (48:29) – “Muhammad is the messenger of Allah. And those with him are hard (ruthless) against the disbelievers and merciful among themselves” Islam is not about treating everyone equally. This verse tells Muslims that there are two very distinct standards that are applied based on religious status. Also the word used for ‘hard’ or ‘ruthless’ in this verse shares the same root as the word translated as ‘painful’ or severe’ to describe Hell in over 25 other verses including 65:10, 40:46 and 50:26.. First of all, Allah is talking about the time of Muhammad[PBUH]; he’s talking about those believers who were with them(Sahabas) not us, Muslims from a general point of view. It does NOT even urge us to “not treat people equally”. It just gives us a fact about the Sahabas. Second of all, words with multiple meanings in Arabic differ depending on their place in the sentence. 39. Quran (61:4) – “Surely Allah loves those who fight in His cause” Religion of Peace, indeed! The verse explicitly refers to “rows” or “battle array,” meaning that it is speaking of physical conflict. This is followed by (61:9), which defines the “cause”: “He it is who has sent His Messenger (Mohammed) with guidance and the religion of truth (Islam) to make it victorious over all religions even though the infidels may resist.” (See next verse, below). Infidels who resist Islamic rule are to be fought. Religion of peace?! INDEED! So where is the order for us to FIGHT innocents like the terrorists do(who aren’t peaceful at all)?! I still can’t see it! Oh would you make it more clear?! Yes it is speaking of “physical conflict” not some people killing innocents with no conflicts(Example: ISIS, etc.). 40. Quran (61:10-12) – “O You who believe! Shall I guide you to a commerce that will save you from a painful torment. That you believe in Allah and His Messenger (Muhammad), and that you strive hard and fight in the Cause of Allah with your wealth and your lives, that will be better for you, if you but know! (If you do so) He will forgive you your sins, and admit you into Gardens under which rivers flow, and pleasant dwelling in Gardens of’Adn- Eternity [‘Adn(Edn) Paradise], that is indeed the great success.” This verse refers to physical battle in order to make Islam victorious over other religions (see verse 9). It uses the Arabic root for the word Jihad. Quran[61:9]: “It is He who sent His Messenger with guidance and the religion of truth to manifest it over all religion, although those who associate others with Allah dislike it.” Quran[61:10]: “O you who have believed, shall I guide you to a transaction that will save you from a painful punishment?” Quran[61:11]: “[It is that] you believe in Allah and His Messenger and strive in the cause of Allah with your wealth and your lives. That is best for you, if you should know.” Quran[61:12]: “He will forgive for you your sins and admit you to gardens beneath which rivers flow and pleasant dwellings in gardens of perpetual residence. That is the great attainment.” Nothing is wrong, everything is alright… Except the website’s claims. Yes the verse uses the Arabic root of “Jihad”, but do you know what Jihad means?! Oh don’t they?! Just to remind you with it, Jihad is a struggle against corruption, injustice, poverty, or anything in humane. 🙂 41. Quran (66:9) – “O Prophet! Strive against the disbelievers and the hypocrites, and be stern with them. Hell will be their home, a hapless journey’s end.” The root word of “Jihad” is used again here. The context is clearly holy war, and the scope of violence is broadened to include “hypocrites” – those who call themselves Muslims but do not act as such. Other verses calling Muslims to Jihad can be found here at Let’s remind them again of what Jihad means, etc. Shall we?! Jihad: a struggle against corruption, injustice, poverty, or anything in humane. Therefore: Those desbelievers and hypocrites mentioned in the verse are a source of these evil things. Also: Doesn’t urge us, Muslims to fight disbelievers or non Muslims. But orders Muhammad[PBUH]. Hope everything is clear now.. As for hadiths, not all of them are 100% authentic. And others doesn’t even urge us, muslims nor had urged the previous Muslims to kill innocents. Even though some of these hadiths does not show that Muhammad[PBUH] killed innocents nor did anything bad. Hadiths means Conversation. And in the conversations of Muhammad[PBUH], Muhammad[PBUH] can say anything or can forget or think that being more specific is not as important.

Conclusion: Islam is NOT a religion of violence, therefore ISIS are NOT real Muslims….


Your First claim on Quran 50:38 “And We did certainly create the heavens and earth and what is between them in six days, and there touched Us no weariness.” No scientific error. It’s just a fact from Allah about the creation of the universe. Your second claim on Quran 20:54 “Eat [therefrom] and pasture your livestock. Indeed, in that are signs for those of intelligence.” You quoted the verse wrong in your video LOL! That’s just another expose on you. However the Quote in your video is actually in the Quran, but not in these number of verses. It was actually 20:53 “[It is He] who has made for you the earth as a bed [spread out] and inserted therein for you roadways and sent down from the sky, rain and produced thereby categories of various plants.” As you can pretty much see, allah says “YOU”. He’s not stating a fact about it, but he tells us how he made it for us. And it seems to us that it is “Spread out as a bed” as Allah mentions. Otherwise, people wouldn’t have thought that Earth is flat. 🙂 Your third claim about 15:26 “And We did certainly create man out of clay from an altered black mud.” Yes, we are made out of mud for your own information. Adam{PBUH] basically was made out of mud, when he breeds sperm is involved. Therefore we’re made out of sperm with the mud of our GREATEST ancestor Adam[PBUH]. Evolution was a theory, and still is actually a theory that doesn’t 100% accurately apply with us, humans. Your claim about 55:33.. LOL. You said space flight is impossible. Allah didn’t say that… You’re an idiot basically. Here’s the verse retard! “O company of jinn and mankind, if you are able to pass beyond the regions of the heavens and the earth, then pass. You will not pass except by authority [from Allah ].” The reason you’re living till now is by the Authority and will of Allah. Allah OBVIOUSLY didn’t say that space travelling is impossible. Adam was right when he said that you interpret things on your own way. :)))))))))))))))))))))) Your claim about 29:14.. “And We certainly sent Noah to his people, and he remained among them a thousand years minus fifty years, and the flood seized them while they were wrongdoers.” The people of Noah are DIFFERENT than the us and are different from the people of a’ad and are also different from the people of Adam!!!!!!!!!!! There are types of people through time, so since the beginning of time till now there were periods of times where specific messenger comes to the people of that specific time. That’s how the history of Humans in Islam, more specifically in the Quran. And they’d make some sense despite opposing scientific history due to the presence of the miracles that verfies the truthfullness of that book. :))))))))))) Your claims about 17:18-19 LOL, you quoted them wrong again!!! But the Quote does exist in the quran. It is actually 27:18 and 19 “Until, when they came upon the valley of the ants, an ant said, “O ants, enter your dwellings that you not be crushed by Solomon and his soldiers while they perceive not.”” “So [Solomon] smiled, amused at her speech, and said, “My Lord, enable me to be grateful for Your favor which You have bestowed upon me and upon my parents and to do righteousness of which You approve. And admit me by Your mercy into [the ranks of] Your righteous servants.”” Didn’t you know that Solmon[PBUH] had the ability to talk to animals and communicate with them? Yeah you pretty much interpretted it on your own way and made it look like that Allah is saying that all ants talk as a fact.

Muslim defends Quran

AMOS YEE HAS 8 CHARGES! Mostly from wounding islam. However…..


Wounding Religion:

Sharing Dusty Smith’s Video (Somebody has to notify him):


Banned anti-islam Facebook post:


Greatest anti-christian video of all time:


Finger on Quran:


Ending line FUCK ALLAH!


Greatest islam Video Of All Time


Not reporting to police station:

On 14 December 2015 to ISP Doreen Chong

On 10 May compelled by Magistrate Choo


However, they forgot…..


Wounding Religion

Fuck Islam and Allah doesn’t exist (Calvin Cheng):


Refuting Christians With Own Christian Bible:


Response to ISIS Death Threat:


Sudden Religious Stab! :


In Preparation For Anal Sex:


In the Middle Fuck Islam:


Burn Allah Burn!:







Disobeying court orders

Unprivatising lee kuan yew video:


Unprivatizing banned margaret thatcher buttfucking lee kuan yew image:


Lying to police

I’m using my friend’s laptop:




And many other instances, I can’t keep count anymore




charge 1charge 2charge 3charge 4charge 5charge 6charge 7charge 8

AMOS YEE HAS 8 CHARGES! Mostly from wounding islam. However…..

Police broke into house and took $16000 worth of items Amos Yee says

Amos went down from his house in Jurong at around 3pm to find 3 police officers camping at the void deck downstairs. Once spotted, they immediately went up and handcuffed him.

The police brought Amos back to his house as many members of the public looked anxiously at poor handcuffed Amos, to his humiliation.

Without using the key that was taken from Amos, the police forcefully broke into the house. A concerned neighbour went up to the house and asked what was going on. The officer subsequently slammed the door on his face

Seeing that the house was filled with lots of boxes and stuff, the police officers called for assistance. 9 police officers searched through the entire 5 room flat for 3 hours.

Confiscated items include:

5 phones

7 laptops (1 of which is was Amos’ mother’s working laptop that had her prepared tuition notes inside and it significantly disrupted her work)

1 desktop computer

6 cameras

3 tripods

The police took approximately $16000 worth of items

When the police decided to send Amos back to the police station, they found an extra need to put plastic shackles on Amos’ arms, legs and around his body. They were very tight and Amos expressed discomfort but the officers refused to loosen them until quote ‘we are back at the station’. Once the shackles were loosened, there were noticeable bruises on both arms and legs.

In the police station, Amos was then subjected to a tedious and unbearable 57 question long interrogation in a cold room. ISP Doreen Chong asked questions like:

‘what was your intention to post the picture of you showing the middle finger on the quran’

‘did you know that your words would offend people?’

‘what do you mean by halal-snorters?’

Amos found out that they had tracked every possibly offensive religious comment since mid december when he was issued the letter to compel to go for investigations

Amos expressed reluctance in answering the questions in between the interrogation. Another male officer then threatened Amos saying, ‘if you don’t answer these questions, we can infer that to a different meaning and it will be to your disadvantage in court’.The session continued

Amos was then thrown into a cell.


hole on ground (toilet)

hole on wall with button beside (water comes out)

*no mats or sheets were given. Nothing was provided


Amos was so traumatised, he was unable to eat the entire day, during the 12 hours he was in the police station.

Amos is now out on 5k bail posted by his mother

Police broke into house and took $16000 worth of items Amos Yee says

The Banned anti-singapore fireworks facebook post

Here is the post:

‘There was an 8-minute firework showcase at marina bay last night, and the display is large and extremely expensive, but it is blisteringly dull. Malaysia spent much less on fireworks than singapore, yet their display was so much more creative and fun to watch. This is once again stunningly indicative of how horrid our arts scene is (the organisers were most definitely government dogs), you talentlessly launch one explosive after another with absolutely no sensitivity to to presentation of style, and just make it bigger and longer so you can fool the stupid general population into thinking it was awesome; it’s the transformers of fireworks.

But no matter, fireworks as a form of entertainment is just generally horrible, you frighten birds and homeless animals (Fuck them! Why should we care about creatures who are lower than us. As lee kuan yew said, fuck equality), and to quote Amos Yee (yours truly) ‘What can be more filled with depth, and remind us about the great legacy that singapore has, than seeing our tax dollars BURN in the air!’ I mean…. enjoying the display of fireworks. And of course you have sph fucks like TheStraitsTimes and ChannelNewsAsia boast about it as if it’s something to be proud of, then again this problem isn’t just exclusive to our country (Fuck everyone of you).

And the assholes, quote unquote ‘cool kids’ who were self-indulgently ‘enjoying’ the display are either oblivious or fucking delusional (just like christians; HAHA! SUDDEN RELIGIOUS STAB)(And seriously, how are you able to stand the boredom of marina bay sands and hearing music that drops the bass 48 times, without fucking killing yourself? You must have honed that skill in school), here you are causing noise pollution, preventing thousands or animals and people from sleeping, and then when truly empathetic people like me knows about the troubles you’re causing to them for your ‘enjoyment’ and points out the issue, you ignore it, and then claim that person is not empathetic because they criticised and hurt you wee-little feelings.

And this essentially sums up the general personality of singaporeans (well… at least 70% of them), living misinformed lives, enjoying themselves based on other people’s expense, and then completely denying responsibility and blaming others for the flaws that they have. Why do we not have a distinctly cultural identity of our own? Because our culture, the celebrations, the leaders, fucking suck; which the government of course doesn’t want to reveal.

singaporeans fucking suck, but what do you expect when their role model is the group of communist dictators that is the singapore government. Thanks pap; fuck you (pap-bashing continues :D)’

Previously for the anti-islam Facebook post (

I was banned for 24 hours, this time I was banned for 3 days.

Now of course the crux of the post – the vehement political bashing, was definitely not the reason the post was removed (because if you’ve seen my output, if that were the case my account would have been banned months ago); it has to be about religion, so I was definitely banned for 3 days because of the one sentence, ‘And the assholes, quote unquote ‘cool kids’ who were self-indulgently ‘enjoying’ the display are either oblivious or fucking delusional (just like christians; HAHA! SUDDEN RELIGIOUS STAB)’ (I’m really a fan of sudden quick analogical digressions to stab religion).

So now I think I finally get these ‘community guidelines’. If it’s a simple ad hominem attack like, ‘STUPID MUSLIM CUNT XD’, that’s alright. But if it’s a comment that stings religious nuts by revealing a truth about them; that’s transgression; even if it’s just one sentence. I think it’s exactly the same criteria of how singapore charges someone for ‘intending to wound religious feelings, when they wanted to arrest me for the remark in the calvin cheng blog post (, ‘Fuck Islam and Allah doesn’t exist’.

Not only was I unable to post any public posts on my timeline for 3 days, I also couldn’t post public comments on posts too (which is still ridiculous but can be better argued, I shouldn’t be able to post anything public because I am a hate speech dangerous fuck), but what really ticked my nipples, was when I realised that they also prevented me from PRIVATELY messaging people. I could see the fucking messages sent to me but could not reply to them (Someone sent me a PM and I had to fucking reply to them with SMS. For communicating with the few people that do not have whatsapp and since I do not have an unlimited SMS function on my fucking phone, it is really fucking annoying). Especially for someone who uses Facebook messenger as the primary way to message someone and especially for someone who has several contacts on Facebook and no where else, this is horrible for me, With the previous bans I had I think the same thing happened, just that I don’t think I private messaged or commented on posts on Facebook in that time to have noticed. This has absolutely nothing to do with my offence, has absolutely no reason to act as a punishment; it is fucking wretched.

I am in an extremely precipitous position, now I’ve violated Facebook community guidelines about 4 times and since this time I’ve been banned for a lengthy 3 days, this would probably be my last chance before my account becomes permanently taken down, just like what happened to Alvin Tan. And there’s a very high chance that with my frequent use of facebook, even though I think I’m pretty familiar with how not to violate the community guidelines (apparently hate speech posts are wrong but linking to hate speech posts are alright), sooner or later by accident (I do not have a proofreader), I’ll violate the community guidelines again, and my account will be deleted.

Alot of my written posts I did not initially save on microsoft word or google docs but fortunately Facebook has a very easy way to have an archive backup (; perhaps because facebook was self-aware several accounts would be banned under their disgisting dogma.

Afterwards what happens? I’ll set up a new account (Not being on Facebook will lose a way too significant portion of people to see my incredible content, so I fucking hate it, but I gotta work with them). So be prepared to like that new one munchkins once the account is removed, and with more chances to violate community guidelines, hopefully the 2nd one doesn’t get deleted. And like with every newly made account, probably less than a-tenth of my initial followers will like my new page once it first starts up, meaning thousands of people will less likely stumble upon my amazing content; it’s extremely depressing and I’ll be sad for about 2 hours but that’s what happens when the biggest social networking site is run by a group of corporate cunts who wants to suck up to powerful conservative assholes so they can gain more sponsors and develop more relationships with companies to earn more money. When the primary function of social networking sites is the proliferation of ideas, this type of censorship fucking deplorable. Hopefully the news of the deletion of my account will attract enough shares and news coverage, making gaining back my followers,  attracting new ones and raising awareness to this wretched censorship of facebook greater; for popular public figures you can always bank on the streisand effect.

I will continue creating awesome content; just that people like Mark Zuckerberg will prevent these posts from being more popular than they can be, leading to humanity to remain stupid for a longer time. I think in my long list of victims (PAP, feminists, religious people, homophobes, non-vegans, conservatives, copyright advocates etcetera etcetera etcetera) Facebook is now one of them, and everyone knows that when you have incurred the wrath of Amos Yee; you will be fucked. Mark Zuckerberg, your American ass is grass.



*Update: Alvin Tan told me on Twitter that I actually have more chances left before Facebook permanently deletes my account; there will be a subsequent 7-day ban, then a final 30-day ban; so hopefully I play my cards right and don’t violate the guidelines another 2 times XD Hate speech still continues on wordpress and other sites though 😀


The Banned anti-singapore fireworks facebook post

I do not want the chestnuts Amos Yee minimovie to be made

I do not want people to donate to the indiegogo campaign fund launched by Chestnuts, for the making of the AmosYee mini-movie; I do not want that minimovie to be made; it probably would be made in some form, whether or not they raise that 25 thousand dollars, I hope it doesn’t though.

Now initially, I wanted to distance myself from this news, and not even talk about it, because of course, criticizing something brings awareness to it(And I should know, haha), and even though Mothership and YahooNews already reported it, the indiegogo fund still has really low donations, and I wanted to keep it that way, so I thought mentioning it would help them generate more donations.

However, I then realised, that a huge portion of the people who’d probably donate, are fans of me, and if I complain about it, I’d prevent many of them from wasting their money. And I’m also thinking, no way would my haters donate to this campaign to spite me, because the extent of their mindless hatred will only amount to the occasional bad arguments and ‘fuck you Amos Yee’.

Ultimately, though I raise awareness to this campaign, I might be able to significantly reduce the donations in these 34 days, or it might have the opposite effect who knows. Anyways, I’m taking the risk, and hopefully it has the effect I want.

So from their little pitch ‘Help us make this movie about a boy that went too far and a system that went even further.’ It’s obvious that they’re not fans of my work, and they shouldn’t be, they probably don’t understand 60% of it.

The story of my video and my imprisonment is one of, if not the most compelling and fascinating story to come out from Singapore, and they do not have the skill to do the story justice. I guarantee, they’re just going to make me into this annoying american stereotype, incessantly making jokes about my American accent, thinking that they’re doing something funny, dumbing down an absolutely fascinating character and story filled with intrigue and nuance, into an atrocious piece of trash you call entertainment. Do you guys have any integrity towards the source material? You might as well let Uwe Boll make a movie about Gandhi.

They will not anything special about my story; they are just going to repeat the same opinion held by thousands of simple-minded Singaporeans who laughably think that they’re saying something original, when they aren’t; the claim that ‘he was very rude in his delivery, but the Government should not have sent him to jail for it’.

No where, will they explore, the genuinely unique opinions about me, like: ‘not only did he criticize the Government, he also broke many boundaries in terms of presenting political rhetoric, when he used vulgar language, it’s quite amazing.’ Or: ‘he’s not a one-trick pony, other than criticizing Lee Kuan Yew, looking at both his older works and his new ones, he has many great and original things to say, and will continue doing so.’ (And yes to the chagrin of my haters and the Government, I know you’re pretty pissed off that I’m not a one-trick pony. A one-trick pony makes one viral video, but not only do I have ‘Lee Kuan Yew is finally dead’, but ‘National Day sucks’, ‘PAP king manipulators’. How many viral videos have I made? Like 5?) Or the view that I am an absolute creative genius and as Nathan Heller pointed out, could very well be the contemporary Voltaire. And you’re probably going to try to criticize me by saying that I’m just calling these opinions original because they portray me in a good light. But really, it isn’t arrogant or surprising to say, every original opinion about me should be flattering, because the fact of the matter is I am brilliant.

And Chestnuts is going fool stupid Singaporeans (ie majority of the population) to think that they’re saying something original, just because they made it into a musical by parodying pop songs that are as wretched as them. Just because you sing stupidity doesn’t mean it isn’t stupid.

And that actor that’s going to play me, god damn, you’re not going to see a performance more cringeworthy this year than seeing that asshole portray me. The only preparation he probably did to rehearse for that part was hitting himself on the head. Only people who are brainless twits (ie the majority of the population) and idiots from mothership would say that this talentless nitwit ‘does a pretty convincing job (Jeanette from mothership is a very sad, dissatisfied, insecure cunt, and from the many 3rd-rate articles she has written about me, especially the one about my biography, I can tell that she’s really jealous of me. If you want to air your opinions written during your menstrual cycle, I think you should consider a career other than journalism).

One of the greatest modern thinkers and political dissidents in Singapore, and one of the most fascinating and unique person in the world (I know), is going to be reduced to an attention-seeking, loud-mouthed spoilt brat (and don’t respond to this line thinking you’re smart and made a tremendous burn when you really didn’t, with a comment like ‘isn’t that exactly who you are?’; I’m way ahead of you bitch).

The fucking gall for these group of idiots to think they have the skills to tackle my story; the fucking gall for YahooNews to imply that I would collaborate with these talentless hacks on this cesspool of a production; I might as well call  Jack Neo to ask him for a cameo in Ah Boys To Men 4, I’m sure he would like to continue his director’s trademark of exploiting famous Youtube Celebrities for higher gross revenue; thank god the director of this ‘Amos Yee’ minimovie, didn’t involve me in their shit production, I’d TP their set.

Now the biggest reason, why people would donate to help fund this piece of shit, is that if this mini-movie gets made, it will piss the MDA and Government off. Wow, chestnuts managed to circumvent the system, and be free to make something the Government doesn’t like by doing it on the internet, and I think they mentioned that realisation came after being partly inspired by me; hahaha, you know out of all the brilliant things I’ve done, my choice of platform to criticize the Government, is one of my lesser accomplishments; you can make videos online criticizing the Government, and that allows you to be completely free from the censorship of the MDA? WOW! WHY HAVEN’T I THOUGHT OF THAT BEFORE? You have to be fucking retarded to not have realised that; members from opposition parties, are fucking retarded. Instead of starting a Youtube channel, making weekly Youtube videos, exposing the flaws of the Government all year round, they continue letting PAP be the only ones proliferating their bullshit propaganda daily, and then only wait till election period to give uninspired, boring campaign speeches for 1 week, expecting people to come to their side. No wonder they lost the elections, stupid fucks.

The fact of the matter is (and I should very well know, haha), that this project would not have gained as much attention if it didn’t piss the Government off. It’s similar to Sonny Liew’s ‘The Art Of Charlie Chan Hock Chye’, which I’m probably the only few people who owns a copy of it and actually read it (thanks Sonny for sending me a free copy, if anytime is possible, I’d like to buy Doctor Fate :D); the only difference is that ‘The Art Of Charlie Chan Hock Chye’ was actually pretty fucking good; this play by chestnuts however, won’t be; it will fucking suck.

And please don’t pseudo-intellectually retort, ‘You haven’t even watched the full movie, how would you know that it would suck?’ You can, because if let’s say you see a movie trailer by Jack Neo coupled with racial stereotype jokes, or a trailer with lots of explosions that says ‘directed by Micheal Bay; I think without watching the full movie, it would be safe to assume that it will fucking suck.

In wanting to anger PAP don’t let these groups of assholes do it. It’s very embarrassing to our side. I know you really want to piss the Government off, but please do maintain some self-respect, jesus.

If you thought I would like this campaign, or actually donated because you thought I would want this movie to be made, you should throw yourself off a building you’re so dumb. My fanbase is(should be), more intelligent than that, so if you actually donated to this campaign to try to show support for me, I renounce you as a fan; go over to wahbanana.

Fucking dumbasses who spent money on this shit, instead you should take that money, and send it to my paypal (, support content-creators with actual talent instead of these talentless hacks.

I’m fucking disgusted of people who are able to accept absolute trash, simply because it is critical of our shit Government. It’s like the play Public enemy, it’s a pretentious, long-winded, pompous piece of shit, that had a good audience reaction and good reviews, because the reviewers were as talentless as the creators, and the play was anti-Government.

I think in wanting to piss the Government off, there should be an amount of quality assurance in doing so, otherwise what’s the point? If the work that criticises the Government is bland and unoriginal, it’s not going to be effective anyways; which is why Chee Soon Juan spent more than 20 years making speeches, and yet a 17-year-old boy makes 1 Lee Kuan Yew video, and creates more of an impact than Chee Soon Juan ever did.

People like Jack Neo, chestnuts and the entirety of mediacorp, provide dumb entertainment, for the dumb population, and think that they’re actually contributing to society under the guise of raising awareness and encouraging others to think critically about social issues; when ironically they’re doing the exact opposite; how would you encourage people to be critical when you recycle already existing, redundant opinions, and then lower the population’s IQ with your horrible actors and storylines? These quote unquote ‘artists’, will become completely irrelevant in a decade, just like the Justin Biebers and Taylor swifts of our time, and when they do, I wouldn’t even bother laughing because by then, I will not give a solitary fuck, and neither will you.

Fuck chestnuts, and fuck this ‘Amos Yee’ minimovie, I want all of you to boycott the campaign, mock everyone who donated, and if the mini-movie does come out, dislike the video, make fun of all the people involved in the production, and feel no qualms in criticizing the shit out of it, because it will very well deserve it.

More freedom of speech will inevitably allow more pieces of shit like this to be made, but what I want Freedom of speech for speech for, is to provide a wider platform for people to produce quality work. So when you advocate freedom of speech, aim for a platform not to air opinions freely, but to air, good opinions freely; not fucking crap, like this Chestnuts mini-movie. Have fun!

I do not want the chestnuts Amos Yee minimovie to be made

Chee Soon Juan’s Blunder In The Singapore Elections Debate

Last night in the general elections debate, Lawrence from PAP attacked SDP’s Chee Soon Juan, by bringing up the matter that more than 10 years ago, Chee Soon Juan had been charged for presenting wrong statistics in a report, and never acknowledged that mistake in public.

It was very much issued as an ad hominem attack when Lawrence was lacking an argument, and yes it was used as an underhand tactic in public television when the debaters from PAP were completely void of cogent points to the discussed topics at all, but that doesn’t mean that what Lawrence said was untrue.

From the information I’ve gathered, all opposition parties do not know the specifics of the government spending, but Chee Soon Juan presented a healthcare report that made him seem like he was completely aware of the specifics, and thus he presented some wrong statistics in that report and was able to be charged and sentenced for it.
Yes it is unfair that withholds information about Government spending from everyone other than themselves, and yes there shouldn’t be a law is able to charge you for producing wrong information.

But nonetheless, it is true that Chee Soon Juan got charged for producing a false report, and never acknowledged that mistake in public, so Lawrence was able to mention that and walk all over him, and when Chee Soon Juan had a chance to make a response, he tried to cover it up!

All Chee Soon Juan had to say when Lawrence mentioned that incident in response was, “Oh yes I screwed up that time. Sorry about that haha. Hopefully I don’t make sure a mistake again in the future”. That was it, and PAP will never be able to effectively use that against him, ever again.

You opposition members gotta be honest with your mistakes, there’s no shame in admitting them, then you wouldn’t be accused by the PAP for trying to cover up information, and that’s how you guys can gain can more effectively advocate that ‘transparency’, you blame the Government lacks oh so much.

Chee Soon Juan’s Blunder In The Singapore Elections Debate